News

VT GOP Chair McDonald Stepping Down

by vtg0p on January 20, 2012

Pat McDonald Announces She Will Step Down As VTGOP Chair

 

Montpelier, VT . . . Pat McDonald announced today that she would be stepping down at Chair of the Vermont Republican Party at the end of this month, but would be continuing to assist the VT GOP in communications and outreach.  Below is her statement:

“The past year has been one of the most exciting and rewarding times of my career.  I have immensely enjoyed serving as Chair of the Vermont Republican Party, and I’m very proud of what we have been able to accomplish in positioning the VT GOP for the opportunities that lie ahead.

“Make no mistake, the ground is fertile for big changes in Vermont in 2012.  The people of Vermont have grown weary of politics as usual, and they have little patience left for politicians who make promises they can’t keep.  They are looking for leaders to take them in a new direction:  leaders who will help grow our economy, create new opportunities for the people that live here, and bring about a new age of prosperity in Vermont.

“This is a time that the Vermont Republican Party needs to expand and prepare ourselves for the elections of 2012.  It is also a time for me to dial back somewhat on my responsibilities with the Party as my husband and I are dealing with some personal health concerns that will keep me out of the office more than I would like.

“I am making this announcement early in 2012 so that the Party can quickly elect and rally around a new Chair.  I met with our Executive Committee the other night to inform them of my plans, and it is their intent to hold the election for Chair in mid-February.  In the interim, Vice Chair Paul Carroccio will serve as Chair of the VT GOP.

“I am proud of what we have been able to accomplish over the past year.  We have developed a solid working relationship with grassroots supporters, County and Town Chairs, as well as with GOP House and Senate leadership.  We have implemented a training program for grassroots volunteers.  We have put a coordinated effort in place to identify candidates for statewide and legislative positions.  Now, we need to build upon those successes and take it to the next level.

“I plan on staying very involved with the VT GOP, helping to spread the Party’s message and working on several communications and outreach projects.  I look forward to working with the new Chair to build upon the growing enthusiasm of our supporters and other like-minded Vermonters who understand the importance of bringing balance and common-sense to Montpelier.

“It has been an honor to serve as Chair, and as I move into a different role with the Party I would like to conclude this statement by telling everyone that I will be manning the VT GOP’s booth at the Yankee Sportsman’s Classic this weekend at the Champlain Valley Expo . . . and if you would like to learn more about the Vermont Republican Party and our agenda of Growth, Opportunity and Prosperity, please stop by and say hello!”

###

 

 

{ 2 comments }

Here’s House GOP Leader Don Turner of Milton talking about the new legislative session with Rob Roper!

{ 0 comments }

Can Montpelier Control Costs?

by vtg0p on January 11, 2012

Can Montpelier Control Costs?

Representatives Oliver Olsen of Jamaica and Jim Eckhardt of Chittenden sent out this press release on January 9th, and we wanted to pass it along.  Olsen and Eckhardt compared per-pupil education spending with healthcare expenditure data, and found that “. . . from 1999 through 2009, the growth of per pupil spending was ten percent higher than the growth rate of per capita healthcare spending.”
And now the Governor wants the State to take over health care financing as well?  Sounds like Montpelier has a lot to learn about cost control!
*** 

Top Down and Top Heavy

Study of ed funding system offers poor prognosis for state-run healthcare system

 

Montpelier, Vt. - As the Vermont legislature continues its push for a government-run healthcare system, new data from a report on Vermont’s education funding system suggests that the state has a lot to learn about cost control.

 

According to the report by Dr. Lawrence Picus, which was commissioned by the Vermont Legislature, since the passage of Act 60, Vermont has experienced the largest growth of per-pupil spending in the country – 149.9% between 1999 and 2011. Yet, despite this dramatic rise in spending, the report finds that, “Vermont’s results have been relatively flat, or exhibit only modest increases, over the past five years.”

 

“We have learned a lot from Act 60, but most importantly, we have learned that top-down approaches from Montpelier are heavy on cost and light on outcomes,” said Rep. Oliver Olsen of Jamaica, a member of the tax-writing House Ways & Means Committee.

 

Since 1999, the growth of per-pupil spending in Vermont has actually outpaced healthcare spending growth, prompting lawmakers to question whether the state is capable of reigning in the cost of education or healthcare with a top-down approach from Montpelier.

 

Together with Rep. Jim Eckhardt of Chittenden, a member of the House Healthcare Committee, Olsen compared per-pupil spending data used in the Picus report with healthcare expenditure data from the Department of Banking, Insurance, Securities, and Healthcare Administration (BISHCA).

 

“The data shows that, from 1999 through 2009, the growth of per pupil spending was ten percent higher than the growth rate of per capita healthcare spending,” commented Olsen.

 

Even as student enrollment declined by 18%, Vermont’s education revenues jumped from $850M in 1999 to $1.5B in 2011 – propelled by a convoluted funding mechanism that has fueled increasing staff levels. While enrollment has been falling, the report found that, from 1999-00 to 2009-10, teaching positions increased by 3.1%, and administrative staffing levels increased by 22% from 2000-01 and 2009-10.

 

Rep. Eckhardt commented, “Governor Shumlin is using the increasing cost of healthcare to justify a government takeover of Vermont’s healthcare system and the creation of massive new state bureaucracy.”

 

Eckhardt continued, “It is clear that we have a bigger cost problem with a system the state already took over, so why not solve that problem first?”

 

###

 

 Comparison of Vermont Per Pupil Spending vs. Per Capital Healthcare Spending

 

 

Comparison of Vermont Per Pupil Spending vs. Per Capita Healthcare Spending   

Source: NEA Rankings & Estimates (via Picus Report) and BISHCA Expenditure Analysis Data (via JFO)  

 

 

{ 0 comments }

On the State of the State

by vtg0p on January 11, 2012

From the desk of Pat McDonald, VT GOP Chair:
On January 5th, the Governor delivered the annual State of the State speech to the General Assembly.  The Governor used the occasion to praise Vermont’s strength and resilience following Tropical Storm Irene, and we join him in recognizing all those that gave – and lost – so much.
The State of the State is also the Governor’s opportunity to tell us where it is he intends to lead us.  On that point, we were left with grand visions of where the Governor wants to go, but little idea of how we might get there.  As one reporter put it, it was “brimming with optimism, light on substance.”
The simple truth is that the real challenges we face require strong, substantive proposals.  We need to grow Vermont’s economy, create more opportunities for the people that live here, and bring about a new age of prosperity for our state.  To achieve that, we will need to make smart policy decisions . . . because empty promises won’t get us anywhere.
We wanted to bring three items related to the State of the State to your attention:
***
 First, notwithstanding the Governor’s stated determination not to increase broad-based taxes on Vermonters, Senator Randy Brock correctly noted that we must watch what the Governor does, not what he says:

Republican gubernatorial candidate Randy Brock, meanwhile, said there’s no reason to believe Shumlin will walk the walk when it comes to tax policy. Last year, Brock said, Shumlin issued similar admonitions about the ills of higher taxes, then proposed tens of millions of dollars in tax increases on dentists and hospitals.

“I don’t know if he considers that a broad-based tax,” Brock said. “But I certainly know a lot of people who go to the dentist.”  (source:  Times Argus, 1/6/2012)
Senator Brock was also interviewed by WCAX after the speech, which you can watch here.
***
Secondly, we loved the comments made by House GOP Leader Don Turner of Milton.  Representative Turner has spoken out before about how the quick and efficient road reconstruction processes the State utilized after Tropical Storm Irene should become “the new normal.”  Yesterday, the Governor indicated that he, too, thinks it is possible to streamline regulations to move projects faster and less expensively . . . leading to this great quote from Representative Turner:
“During the storm, they realized Vermont is over-regulated,” Turner said, nothing that Republicans have long held that view.  (source:  Burlington Free Press, 1/6/2012)
***
Lastly, while the Governor may be good at making promises, his team may have a difficult time keeping them . . . as evidenced by the reception Shumlin’s single-payer health care team received in the State House on Wednesday.  Members of the House Committee on Health Care questioned the new Green Mountain Care Board about their impartiality and their failure to produce a plan on how the proposed single payer system would be financed.  You can read more about it by following this link to www.vtdigger.org, but here’s an excerpt where concerns are raised by Democratic and Independent legislators:

Rep. George Till, D-Jericho, who sits on the committee, hinted that the legitimacy of the board’s decisions may hinge on how much it can distance itself from the politics of the Shumlin administration.

Till said he wanted to stress the importance of independent decision making. At a meeting earlier in the week, Till said he continued to be concerned by the fact that a November study on the costs of the state’s health care system came from the administration and the Legislative Joint Fiscal Office rather than the non-partisan JFO alone.

Poirier pushed the board on the funding mechanism for the single-payer initiative.

 “The biggest criticism I’m hearing is you’re punting on the financing,” Poirier said.

 ###

{ 0 comments }

Video: Introducing the “$20 for 12″ Program!

by vtg0p on December 29, 2011

Here’s VT GOP Chair Pat McDonald talking about our new “$20 for 12″ initiative . . . it’s a great way to help out the VT GOP, a little bit each month!

Click here to learn how to sign up!

{ 0 comments }

2012 = $20 for 12!

by vtg0p on December 29, 2011

2012 = $20 for 12!

 

Looking for a way to help out the VT GOP a little bit each month, so we can restore balance and common sense in Montpelier?

The VT GOP’s “$20 for 12″ program is a great way to help out your state party!

You can pay $20 each month for 12 months – either via monthly check or credit card.  We’ll remind you when your payments are coming due.  And if you would prefer to pay all $240 for the entire year all at once, you can do that too!

The elections of 2012 will have profound and lasting impacts for Vermont.  NOW more than ever, it is imperative that we stand up, speak out, and DEMAND that our government work on behalf of ALL Vermonters.

As a bonus, all “$20 for 12″ members will also be our guest at the 2012 VT GOP Fall Dinner and will receive special recognition.

If you would like to participate in the “$20 for 12″ program, please fill out the form below and mail it back to us.  If you would prefer to just send us an email indicating you would like to parcipate, that’s okay too!

***
Please fill out the “$20 for 12″ registration form below, and mail back to:
Vermont Republican Party
P.O. Box 70
Montpelier, VT   05601
or send an email to:  mbertrand@vtgop.org
***

YES, please sign me up for the $20 for 12 Program!  

I pledge to contribute $20 each month from December 2011 to November 2012 (total-$240) to support the VT GOP

 Select from one of the options below:

____  I want to pay $20 per month and will send in my monthly contribution

____  I want to pay $20 per month by MasterCard or VISA (VTGOP headquarters will contact you for credit card info)

____  I want to pay my total of $240.  Bill me in one payment.

 

Name:  ______________________________________________

Address: ___________________________________________­­__

City/State/Zip:  ________________________________________

Phone: _____________________________

Email: _______________________________________________

 

Paid for by the Vermont Republican Party

{ 0 comments }

Randy Brock on “You Can Quote Me”

by vtg0p on December 20, 2011

Senator Randy Brock – who recently announced his campaign for Governor – was on “You Can Quote Me” on WCAX this past Sunday, talking about his campaign and the challenges facing Vermont.  Check it out at the link below!

 

 

{ 0 comments }

The Shumlin Administration doesn’t know how they are going to pay for their single payer dreams . . . or if they know, they aren’t letting Vermonters in on the secret!

As part of the Administration’s “Listening Tour” to gather input on how they could possibly raise the hundreds of millions – or even billions – of dollars they will need to collect from Vermonters to fund single payer, a number of potential funding sources were identified.  Surprisingly, one exercise even suggested the property tax as a way to fund single payer health care . . . nevermind the fact that Vermont’s property taxes are already sky high!

Republicans in the Vermont House know that their constituents can’t possibly be asked to pay more in property taxes to fund government-managed health care.  So, several of them demanded that Governor Shumlin take property taxes off the single payer funding menu.

You can read the release from the House Republicans below.  You can also read about the dust-up in this article from the Brattleboro Reformer.

****

New Property Tax to Fund Healthcare?

Republicans Want Property Tax Off the Table as Funding Source

For Immediate Release

December 1, 2011

 

Montpelier, Vt. – After learning that the Shumlin administration is considering the property tax as a “potential funding source” for the Governor’s single-payer healthcare program, several Republican lawmakers have sounded the alarm.

“As a consequence of Act 60, Vermonters are already struggling to afford an escalating property tax burden, so it is unconscionable to think that the Governor is considering a new property tax,” said Rep. Oliver Olsen, a Republican lawmaker from Jamaica who serves on the tax-writing House Ways & Means Committee.

Olsen attended the first of four “listening sessions” on healthcare financing earlier this week, where administration officials outlined a number of potential funding sources for the Governor’s single-payer healthcare program.  In a presentation and handouts at the forum, the property tax was identified as a potential funding source, along with a payroll and income tax.

Republican lawmakers are calling on Governor Shumlin to take property taxes off the table as a funding source for single-payer healthcare.

Rep. Patti Komline of Dorset, a long-time advocate for property tax reform, commented, “Governor Shumlin was a leading advocate for higher property taxes under Act 60, so we need to know that he won’t go back to the property tax again to fund his latest initiative.”

“I can appreciate the difficulty in finding billions of dollars that Shumlin needs to fund his program, but he needs to take the property tax off the table now – Vermonters simply cannot afford a massive property tax hike,” said Rep. Jim Eckhardt, a Chittenden Republican who serves on the House Healthcare Committee.

The lawmakers pointed out that education property tax rates are already being pressured upward due to changes made to the funding formula earlier this year.

###

{ 0 comments }

Icebergs Ahead!

by vtg0p on December 2, 2011

 

ICEBERGS AHEAD

Exchange Impacts Loom Large for VT Employers

 

Decisions being made about Vermont’s federally mandated health care exchange could have profound implications for Vermont businesses and residents.  As reported by VT Digger, employers are increasingly concerned by the impact these new health care exchanges will have on their employee’s health care coverage – as well as their bottom line:

“The federally mandated health benefit exchange will likely limit the number of insurers and plans employers can choose from, and it’s this squeeze on the variety of available options and associated costs that Vermont companies are worried about.”

(Read the full article at www.vtdigger.org:  New federal, state rules for health care insurance rattle businesses).

The stakes are higher in Vermont than in other states, as the Shumlin Administration has been open about their intent to use the exchange framework as their pathway to a taxpayer-funded, government-managed single-payer system.

“The spirit of the exchanges was that Americans would have the ability to choose between insurers and pick the health care coverage that best meets their needs,” says Pat McDonald, VT GOP Chair.  ”But here in Vermont, Governor Shumlin seems determined to use the exchange framework to limit choice and to limit competition.”

“When the Affordable Care Act was being debated in Washington, President Obama promised Americans that if they liked their current health care coverage, they could keep it,” McDonald continued.  ”It remains to be seen whether that promise applies to the citizens of Vermont.”

McDonald also poked fun at the “play money” that is being distributed during the Administration’s “listening tour” in an effort to help participants discuss health care spending*:

“I have to shake my head and laugh at the fact that the Administration is fiddling around with play money.  That says to me that they still have absolutely no idea how to pay for their centrally-planned system,” said McDonald.  ”This is no time for Monopoly money.  This is a time to have a real discussion about what taxes the Administration plans to raise to pay for single-payer, and how those costs will be distributed in our small state.”

“The simple truth is that there are many icebergs ahead for the Administration on their quest for single payer:  how to pay for it, the countless waivers they need, the opposition they will get from Vermonters that like their current health care coverage and want to keep it,” she continued.  ”In light of all those hurdles, the Administration should resist the temptation to use the exchanges to push their single payer dreams, and instead come up with an exchange plan that is in keeping with the spirit of the federal law.”

###


* Background on the “play money”:  The instructions for “Exercise 2: Health Care Reform Financing Sources” distributed at the November 29th public forum in Brattleboro are as follows:  “EXPRESS YOUR PREFERENCE.  All meeting attendees are provided an envelope with $1,000 of money (in $100 denominations -10 X $100).  There are boxes representing the non-federal and provider funding sources described during the presentation. After discussion around the circle, participants should put what they believe to be the proper allocation of their money into the boxes to fund Vermont’s future health care program.”

{ 1 comment }

Happy Thanksgiving!

by vtg0p on November 23, 2011

Happy Thanksgiving! 

 

This Thanksgiving, we give thanks that we live in a beautiful state filled with caring and compassionate people.  In the aftermath of Irene, we witnessed the awe-inspiring spirit and resilience of Vermonters.  We are thankful that we live in this amazing place called Vermont.

 

These Green Mountains

These green hills and silver waters
Are my home – they belong to me
And to all her sons and daughters
May they be strong and forever free
Let us live to protect her beauty
And look with pride on the golden dome
They say home is where the heart is
These green mountains are my home
These green mountains are my home
***
Composed by Diane Martin
Arranged by Rita Buglass Gluck
Words and Music Copyright 2000 by Diane Martin – all rights reserved

{ 0 comments }